Showing posts with label authors. Show all posts
Showing posts with label authors. Show all posts

10 September 2012

Review : Telegraph Avenue

Telegraph Avenue
Author: Michael Chabon
Publisher: Harper (9/11/12)
480 pages

It says a lot that Michael Chabon's publisher, Harper, has pumped more than $250,000 into marketing his new book. Some of those marketing dollars are going to open a pop-up record store in Oakland themed after the one he writes about. A lot of the rest seems to have gone to the special e-book edition:

"an interactive map of Oakland, eight videos of Mr. Chabon, a playlist created by Mr. Chabon, an animated cover, audiobook clips performed by actor Clarke Peters from "The Wire," and a "Telegraph Avenue" theme song composed by Peter Lerman."

If that sounds like a lot of gimmick for a novel, I'm with you. Also, eight videos of Chabon!? Doing what?

The basics are thus: Archy and Nat own a long-suffering record store in Oakland. Things are made worse when a superstar football player decides to open a huge record store nearby. At the same time Archy's junky ex-Blaxploitation film star father shows up because he is trying to blackmail a city councilman. Archy's until now unknown 14-year-old son also pops up and starts a friendship/sexual relationship with Nat's son. Archy's wife, Gwen is pregnant, a mid-wife, and has a run-in with a doctor that quickly gets heated.

The plot is a seems more convoluted then it is. Chabon is clearly attempting to write a Quentin Tarantino movie. He even references the director a lot and goes to pains to describe a few scenes from Kill Bill. He's aiming for that feeling of overlapping narrative, of threads weaving a whole, it comes across more like blatant ass-kissing.

The reviews of this book have all spent a lot of time discussing how great an author Chabon is. They wax on and on about his writing ability and the beauty of his prose. They all say they have problems with the book, that it is not 'perfect' but they all also say that they give him a pass because he's just so good!

It just isn't. The writing is sloppy. His attempts at writing in a musical style are irritating. His endless music and film referenced tossed into dialogue are distracting. The 12-page sentence that makes up one chapter is not creative, it's tedious. Car doors have 'lamentable lamentations' that sound like the 'gate on a crypt filled with vengeful dead folks'.

And 'From the lowest limb of a Meyer lemon, a wind chime searched without urgency for a melody to play.' It is overwrought and trying way too hard to sound interesting. It comes across like a dad at a high school party trying to be into the Lady Gaga's and Rihanna's that the kids love so much.

This isn't even discussing the questionable racial politics he plays.

The book is centered on a black family. The husband is cheating on his pregnant wife. He does it twice. The pregnant wife is portrayed in the book in mostly angry ways, she is either shouting or grumpy the whole time. The 14-year-old is having a homosexual relationship that he refuses to acknowledge because he 'isn't gay' he just likes to fuck the white boy.

The minor black characters are; an NFL star, a deadbeat junky, a fading Blaxploitation star, and a hand full of older jazz-heads who talk a lot about Mingus and Davis.

I have no issue with a white man writing black characters, but this is a grab bag of stereotypes. I think, he was trying to play with that. I think he failed.

On page 48 of the book Gwen catches her husband talking to a woman in a restaurant. Flirting. He follows her outside and they argue. She accuses him of cheating. He lies and says he isn't. In broad daylight she shoves her hands into his pants where 'Her fingers found the heavy coil of hose'. This is what follows:

"Her fingertips were briefly snagged by a film of bodily adhesive as weak as the glue on a Post-it. She tugged her sticky fingers loose, brought them to her nose...Market stalls, smoking braziers, panniers of lentils. All the spice and stink of Ethiopia: turmeric, scorched butter, the salt of the Red Sea."

Again. I THINK he is trying to play with the tropes of racism and the language of Blaxploitation and Tarantino. I dare anyone to read that quote, realize that it is a white author talking about black people, and tell me that it works for them. This is just one example, the worst in my opinion. He goes on to describe several black characters in various spice and earthen terms. A white woman is described as smelling like 'rose perfume'. My eyes fall from my face and roll on the floor.

This is before Barak Obama shows up to offer marriage advice and call a jazz trio 'funky'. The novel is set in 2004. In Oakland. The section is from Obama's perspective. It's odd and makes zero sense. You are pulled from the story and slammed into election year 2012.

This passed a cadre of editors, PR men, lawyers, etc...and they decided to throw $250,000 behind it and tart up the ebook. I'm not saying that it was to distract us, but all the reviews mention it. And so far they all say the book is flawed but Chabon is just so damn good it doesn't matter.

Sorry. It may be an attempt at something, but it ain't good. If this works for you, I'm interested in knowing why. And I want to know in terms other than Michael Chabon once wrote a good book so this one also must be good.

25 July 2012

Authors

A guy I work with recently told me that a group of his girlfriends only liked to read books with female narrators. He related that their conversation ended fairly unresolved because he felt this was silly and said that he had no preference as long as the book was good.

It got me thinking about who I like to listen to when I read. What voices I enjoy most. My previous post mentioned how dull I find the ennui of white middle-class middle-aged men. And it is true. The books I listed at the end of that post are all great novels. They are some of the best even. But I cannot get over how dull it all is.

But to say I like a specific voice would be wrong. Looking at the books I've most loved I find that the common thread is a sense of humor. About the characters, the world, the narrative itself. If a book lacks that, I stop caring.

Basically I want my serious reading with a dose of humility.

Michael Chabon, Haruki Murakami, Anne Carson, Marilynne Robinson, Umberto Eco are a few of the ones I think have managed this at least once. The list is much much larger.

What authors do you think have the magic touch? Which annoy the hell out of you?

19 March 2012

Sellers : Celebrity In Death

Celebrity In Death
Author: J. D. Robb (Nora Roberts)
Publisher: Putnam Adult
Date: 2/21/12
400 pages

J. D. Robb is Nora Roberts. Nora Roberts has written over 200 novels and has over 400 million copies of her books in print. 124 of her books have been NY Times bestsellers. Not one of her novels has been reviewed by the NY Times.

Not one.

This is the 43rd book in the "In Death" series. The 44th will be out in September. The first was in 1995. Just look at that math for a second. She averages 2.6 books a year in this series alone. When you factor in her other series and stand-alone books this woman averages about 7 books a year.

I can't even begin to understand those numbers.

Look at the NY Times hardcover fiction list for a second. 4 of the top 5 are the latest installments in series. Some of them very long-running. The names are the ones you'd suspect as well. Jodi Picoult, James Patterson, even Stephen King and Anne Rice in there for you fans of the 80s and 90s. If you extend to the top 10, 6 books are the latest part in a series. No wonder we keep getting sequels and rehashes of old things. Clearly we like them.

What about these authors keeps people coming back. Is it purely familiarity? These being the written version of watching Two and a Half Men? Or, is it simpler than that.

I am in the middle of reading another long-running series that is no stranger to the best-seller list; Robert Jordan's The Wheel of Time. I won't bore you with the details, but it is a drawn out fantasy series that spans a projected 14 books at an average of 800+ pages each. Nora Roberts lands about half of that with each of her books. But Jordan didn't churn out 7 a year. He didn't even write all 14 books in 23 years. And he died before finishing.

What has kept me reading isn't that Jordan is a particularly great author. The characters are by-the-book and the plot lifted from Lord of the Rings note-for-note. The pacing is glacial and the word count gigantic. I read them because they are digestible.

Like Chicken McNuggets.

I would suspect this is why my mother reads Mary Higgins Clark books. Why my father likes 24. And why Two and a Half Men is still on the air.

Nora Roberts isn't even a new phenomena. Corín Tellado has written 4,000 novellas. R. L. Stein has taken us to Fear Street and given us Goosebumps around 400 times. Enid Blyton wrote 600+ books for children, including Noddy. Roberts isn't even close to the high water mark of Barbara Cartland's 23 novels in one year and 722 total.

Touch this skin honey, touch all of this skin.
Dame Mary Barbara Hamilton Cartland, DBE, CStJ (1901-2001)
I'm not debating the merit of the work. Easily read, simple, escapist entertainments are a huge part of our lives. In some ways these are the most important part. They provide a refuge from whatever it is you need shelter from. As Roberts herself put it when discussing why she still writes shorter, paperback fiction, she "[remembers] exactly what it felt like to want to read and not have time to read 200,000 words." from her years as a young mother of two boys without much time to read.

In 2007  Time named Roberts one of their 100 Most Influential People saying she "has inspected, dissected, deconstructed, explored, explained and extolled the passions of the human heart." That year only two authors made the list, the other was David Mitchell, who has won the Man Booker Prize.

Sellers is my attempt to examine what books are topping the best-seller list and why. To talk about and understand the trends in popular writing.

05 March 2012

Sellers : 11/22/63

11/22/63
Author: Stephen King
Publisher: Scribner 11/8/11
849 pages

I've always had a spot on my shelf for King's work. Say what you want about his books, they are entertaining good reads. I always place him in the same category as Philip K. Dick. A sort of pulp writer who manages to insert depth and artistry into the genre.

When King won the National Book Awards Lifetime Achievement in 2003 Harold Bloom, that bastion of ivory towerism, had this to say:

[the decision is] another low in the shocking process of dumbing down our cultural life...What he is is an immensely inadequate writer on a sentence-by-sentence, paragraph-by-paragraph, book-by-book basis.

My reaction to Harold Bloom.
Book-by-book I find King to masterfully change his style and genre. He is not only a horror, sci fi, or thriller writer. He can jump from Carrie to the Dark Tower books to this new book 11/22/63 with an ease that few writers manage convincingly.

The alternate history novel is not a new thing. It has been done to death. The earliest example is Livy's Ab Urbe Condita which was written between 27 and 25 BC. It examines an alternate 4th century BC where Alexander the Great expanded his empire westward and meet Rome.

Two of my personal favorites are The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick and The Yiddish Policemen's Union by Michael Chabon. Both are about alternate WWII outcomes. The 'Nazis win the war' plot is one that is revisited often. It pops up in books by Stephen Fry, Robert Harris and even Newt Gingrich. One of the best episodes of the original Star Trek (The City on the Edge of Forever) follows this plot and brings in Joan Collins to guest star.

Star Trek has used the alternate time line story numerous times. They have gone so far as to detail an alternate history for their 'mirror' universe in the shows. Fringe, Sliders, and Quantum Leap are both shows that used the changing of history to drive the premise of the show. Dallas famously revealed a whole season to 'be a dream'.


While I find this sort of thing can be very annoying on TV shows. A book can make this trope interesting, fun. In the best examples they allow you to appreciate historical events and the impacts they have in a new light. At worst, you enjoy the ride. It certainly can be a cop out. As a writer, how can I get to play with ready-made characters and situations but divorce them from reality and my need to research? Alternate history!

That isn't to say that people like Philip Roth don't have things to say when they write The Plot Against America. I think they do. And important things can be said with TV as well. Despite Harold Bloom's naysaying I think King has a point with this book.

Sellers is my attempt to examine what books are topping the best-seller list and why. To talk about and understand the trends in popular writing.

27 February 2012

The Open Boat

The Open Boat (Crane and Norton) 2/27

None knew the color of the sky

A Soldier of the Legion lay dying in Algiers

Their eyes glanced level, were fastened upon the waves

There was lack of woman's nursing, there was dearth of woman's tears

These waves were the hue of slate, the tops were foaming white, all knew the colors of the sea

But a comrade stood beside him, and he took that comrade's hand

The horizon narrowed and widened, dipped and rose, at all times its edge was jagged with waves that thrust up in points like rocks

And he said, 'I nevermore shall see my own, my native land'

25 February 2012

The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas

The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas 2/25
Across on tired legs
Feet into soft earth
Yellow mud spotting ankles

Seek refuge seek calming looks
Across the expanse

Remember :
                        dark basement room
                        string of eyes
                        motherless child

The sky opens purple
Cloudless
All unseen

20 February 2012

Sellers : Death Comes To Pemberley

Death Comes To Pemberley (2011)
Author: P. D. James
Publisher: Knopf
304 pages

The fact of this book is strange to me. That someone would write sequels or further adventures of books about Jane Austen characters is difficult for me to get my head around.

Austen wrote fairy tales, and like Shakespeare, her stories somewhat hinge on the idea of the characters having a life beyond the tale, one that we do not see. To show us that 'happily ever after' defeats the purpose and makes me cringe to even think about it.

So why is this book by P. D. James a best seller? Why is James, an award-winning mystery writer, publishing this thing? I mean, she's 80, lists The Third Man as her favorite film and is a Baroness. She should be better then this right? According to reviews the mystery part of the novel is taught and well done, the Austen rehash is not so great. So why do this? Because people WANT to know what happens next to Elizabeth and Mr. Darcy. People NEED to know. Even if knowing ruins everything that they love about the story. Or, people are told they want and need to know.

This is why this book is not only a shame, but happens to not be alone in that shame. There is a whole pantheon of these books. It is nearly a genre at this point. Let's take a look at a few :

Mr. Darcy Takes A Wife by Linda Berdoll
Mr. Darcy's Diary by Amanda Grange
Mr. & Mrs. Fitzwilliam Darcy: Two Shall Become One by Sharon Lathan
Mr. Darcy's Obsession by Abigail Reynolds

You can see a theme here. Every one focuses on Mr. Darcy. Each seems to center around him being an object of desire and obsession. And while I can totally get behind obsessing over this :
Doesn't it all seem a bit 'women can only be happy married and having babies'? And isn't that a bit opposite of the strong women Austen is famous for writing? Isn't that the job of terrible teen lit? Granted, in Austen, they all do get married and it is implicit all have those babies. Despite this, they are not swooning light-headed children who must be protected and kept.

Each of these books takes Austen and turns her into a terrible romance novel cliche. Most are re-imaginings or what-ifs. It all strikes me as lazy. Trading the Austen name for a cheap gimmick. And cash, let's not forget the cash. Speaking of cash :

Pride and Predjudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith and its two sequels Dawn of the Dreadfuls and Dreadfully Ever After neither by Mr. Grahame-Smith. The first time I saw this I was bored by it. Why bother with the book at all? The cover is clearly the joke, the joke is clearly the story invented by the viewer when seeing the title.

I guess my point is that I literally don't get this. Reboots like Star Trek, Charlie's Angels, Hawaii 5-O, Transformers, The Smurfs, The Muppets, The Incredible Hulk, Superman, Spiderman. I've even liked a few of them. At least these are all series which have been re-imagined several times.

My issue isn't about whether they are good or not, it's about the dullness of it all. The attempt to take the familiar and bring it back to life is tantalizing. Keep the good times rolling, find safety in the familiar, etc. I get it, but it's also a clear grab at money that rings shallow. And is it actually reassuring or comforting?

These things are not museums. I'm not advocating pressing pause on culture. The exact opposite actually. The constant re-imagining and remaking only serves to spin the tires. We never have to move beyond Jane Austen because we can just read infinite variations on the theme of Austen written by random hack writers.

Austen is a great theme to deconstruct, she left us 6 books. She is beloved. So we deconstruct the books for our soap operatic pleasure and profit. We re-love the pale imitations in hopes of finding that Colin Firthiness in them. I hate sounding like an old man in an ivory tower but go read Austen herself. She left enough there for us to enjoy I promise. Leave the hack 'girls need boys' tales to teen lit and the bargain bin.